The second week of betting turned out to be much richer in exciting events compared to the first. Not everything is working out so far, and we have to independently test various betting options in order to find something individually suitable.
Recommendation of the month: Telega.in — a platform for native integrations in Telegram channels. Manually verified channels and bots. We help you find your target audience in Telegram and launch effective integrations.
- Bets for the second week
- HC Vitebsk – HC Mogilev
- Wolfsburg – Werder
- Barcelona – Seville
- Admiral – Spartak
- Tappara – K-Espoo
- Municipal Santa Ana – Cartagena
- Monaco – Crvena Zvezda
- Seattle Kraken – Colorado Avalanche
- Siberia – Barys
- Salavat Yulaev – Torpedo N. Novgorod (face-off)
- Salavat Yulaev – Torpedo N. Novgorod
- CSK VVS Samara – Dynamo St. Petersburg
- Calgary Flames – Carolina Hurricanes (faceoffs)
- Calgary Flames– Carolina Hurricanes
- Seattle Kraken – Winnipeg Jets
- MacArthur FC – Newcastle Jets
- Lada Tractor
- Locomotive Yaroslavl – Amur
- Calgary Wranglers – Colorado Eagles
- Results of the second week
Bids for the second week
I placed bets in FONBET.
HC Vitebsk – HC Mogilev
The first bet was made at the beginning of the third period with the score 3:3. The game was very active. They scored one goal each in the first six minutes, so the bet on the score was confident, especially considering the coefficient of 1.42. As a result, they scored not just more than 6 goals, but as many as 10.
Result: +2,100 rubles.
Wolfsburg – Werder
The second bet was made for a total of less than 6.5 with a current score of 2:4. It was 92 minutes, the coefficient of 1.35 looked very attractive.
Result: +1,750 rubles.
Barcelona – Seville
Bet on Barcelona before the start of the match. There was practically no doubt about her victory. The coefficient of 1.33 did not seem to correspond to objective reality. As a result, Barcelona defeated Sevilla without any chances.
Result: +1,650 rubles.
Admiral Spartak
The bet in the third period is on the victory of Spartak. Based on the bookmaker’s statistics, it seemed that the Admiral was significantly inferior to his rival.
However, Spartak, after scoring three goals, for some reason completely stopped playing and missed two in a row in the middle of the second period. It seemed that he managed to stabilize the situation, but 4 minutes before the end of the match, the Admiral was able to equalize the score.
Result: -6.923 rubles.
Tappara – K-Espoo
The bet on the victory of K-Espoo at the beginning of the third period. The team was leading 2-1, and it was interesting to bet with a coefficient of 1.4. Based on how the bookmaker estimated the probability of a different outcome, there was almost no doubt about it. Even for a draw there were more than 3.
Result: +2,000 rubles.
Municipal Santa Ana
Unfortunately, the exit of the medical team at the end of the football match, although it seemed almost an absolute option, failed this time.
The coefficient was 1.77, so it was quite difficult to get past it, there were only a few minutes left.
Result: -5,000 rubles.
Monaco – Crvena Zvezda
The bet on Monaco’s victory was also made in advance. With a coefficient of 1.35, it was strange not to bet. After all, the bookmaker gave more than 6 for Crvena. A more than likely outcome with a fairly high profit.
Result: +1,373 rubles.
Seattle Kraken – Colorado Avalanche
And here’s the bet on the number of deletions. It was also performed in the third period. Considering that the teams managed to score only 3 in the first two, there was no reason to expect a sharp increase in rudeness in the game.
The bookmaker allowed you to bet on less than 4.5 with a coefficient of 1.36, so there was a certain margin of safety for this bet. As a result, there was one deletion in the third period, but it was not enough for the bet not to play.
Result: +1,800 rubles.
Siberia – Barys
For reasons that are not entirely clear, it was just interesting to bet on a Barys this time. A bet on the total number of face-offs at the beginning of the third period. With a coefficient of 1.42, it looked like a good idea.
Unfortunately, the face-offs eventually proved to be quite unstable, although this time we managed to win.
Result: +2,100 rubles.
Salavat Yulaev – Torpedo N. Novgorod (face-off)
But the next throw-in bet turned out to be less successful. Salavat Yulaev and Torpedo were in no hurry to hand the puck over to the referee. For about three minutes they skated without any face-offs at all.
As a result, there is a significant shortage and the inability to even sell a clearly losing bet. Because there is simply no such quote left.
Result: -5,000 rubles.
Salavat Yulaev – Torpedo N. Novgorod
A minute before the end of the match, you could bet that there would be no more goals in the game. Of course, the score of 5:4 and the maximum activity at the end of the match increased the risks of such a bet. But the coefficient of 1.45, considering the puck that had just been thrown, looked pretty confident.
Result: +1,888 rubles.
CSK VVS Samara – Dynamo St. Petersburg
Most likely, it is face-offs, even despite their unpredictability, that can become the most attractive direction for my bets as a result.
There was a third period in the game between CSK and Dynamo, when I bet on more than 54.5. The coefficient of 1.48 and a sufficient number of throw-ins in the first two periods allowed me to confidently bet on this outcome.
Result: +2,400 rubles.
Calgary Flames – Carolina Hurricanes (faceoffs)
An incredible disappointment turned out to be a bet on more than 73.5 throw-ins in the Calgary Flames – Carolina Hurricanes game. The bet was fairly standard: in the third period, the coefficient was 1.4. But they did not get just one throw-in to the coveted mark.
Result: -5,000 rubles.
CalgaryFlames – Carolina Hurricanes
The bet on the total number of goals scored was made a few minutes before the end of the match. The coefficient turned out to be 1.12, although at the time of pressing it was about 1.7. But, unfortunately, it was at the time of making the bet that the bookmaker sharply reduced the coefficient, as a result of which it turned out to be quite indistinct.
As in the case of the bet on Salavat Yulaev, the team had just scored, and there was about a minute left, so the probability of winning the bet was quite high.
Result: +418 rub.
Seattle Kraken – Winnipeg Jets
At the beginning of the third period, the score in the match was 1:2 and nothing foreshadowed that the teams would suddenly start scoring at an incredible speed.
A bet of less than 5.5 with a coefficient of 1.38 looked almost one hundred percent. However, the teams were still able to score the sixth goal in regular time.
Result: -3,901 rubles.
MacArthur FC Newcastle Jets
In the middle of the second half of a football match, it was possible to bet that the teams would not collect more than five yellow cards. The bookmaker gave a high coefficient for this: 1.88.
There were only 3 of them in more than an hour of playing time, so the probability of winning was very high, especially with such bets. As a result, the judge gave out only one more “mustard plaster” and the bet was played.
Result: +4,400 rubles.
Lada Tractor
A potentially erroneous bet made before the start of the game. According to the bookmaker’s odds and team statistics, it seemed that the Tractor would easily win against Lada. But as a result, the 1.59 bet led to a significant decrease in the bankroll.
Result: -5,000 rubles.
Lokomotiv Yaroslavl – Amur
Another throw-in bet. Based on the statistics, it could be assumed that in the third period the teams should score significantly more. However, at some point they apparently decided to just go for a ride with the puck.
As a result, there is a shortage of as many as 5 throw-ins before success. This is quite a big miss in the forecast.
Result: -5,000 rubles.
Calgary Wranglers – Colorado Eagles
We end the second week with a winning bet, albeit with a significant drawdown of the bankroll.
A bet a couple of minutes before the end of the game on the winning team. It is even surprising sometimes that bookmakers give quite high odds on such bets. 1.37 managed to win in just 4-5 minutes.
Result: +1,628 rubles.
Results of the second week
The second week of active betting clearly demonstrated the possibility of earning money. However, the size of the selected bankroll may not allow you to get to a confident depth that allows you to safely bet on the usual positive mathematical probability.
In the current conditions, you should be pretty lucky at the start, and then we will think about how to optimize and scale the strategy.
